Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 SW2D 866 - Cedillo v. Jefferson

Cedillo v. Jefferson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 113th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Villegas v. Carter · Hernandez v. Heldenfels · Hood v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[sjhould it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that he cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify his opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such other order as is just.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We agree with plaintiffs that a medical expert’s affidavit is insufficient if it merely sets forth the expert’s conclusion-ary statement that he is familiar with the standard of care and that the treatment was within that standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.