Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 F.2d 1452 - Morfeld v. Kehm

Morfeld v. Kehm’s Empirical Analysis

803 F.2d 1452 · 1986

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Bristol Steel Iron Works Incorporated v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation (1994), Price v. Seydel (1992)

21 federal appellate · 3 district ·

25019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Perry v. Sindermann · Paul v. Davis · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation · Dioguardi v. United States · Wales ex rel. Wales Trucking Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the prejudice or surprise in fact of the party against whom the excluded witnesses would have testified; (2) the ability of that party to cure the prejudice; (3) the extent to which waiver of the rule against calling unlisted witnesses would disrupt the orderly and efficient trial of the case or of other cases in the court; (4) bad faith or willfulness in failing to comply with the court's order.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “review[ ] the trial court's ruling only for manifest error amounting to an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.