Raymond R. DA ROSA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.2d 24 · 1986
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 140 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 161 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Williams v. Bowen (1988), Nguyen v. Chater (1999)
13 federal appellate · 140 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Gray v. Heckler · Gagnon v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Sherwin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 161 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[he] must make specific findings as to the relevant evidence he considered in determining to disbelieve the appellant.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]ain may be a nonexertional factor to be considered in combination with exertional limitations, even though it may also serve as a separate and independent ground for disability.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In reaching his decision, the AU apparently discounted [the claimant’s] testimony concerning his pain and physical limitations because the extent of pain alleged was not corroborated by objective medical evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Waters v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.