United States v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.2d 246 · 1986
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably United States v. Copeland (2003), United States v. Dunn (1991)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 841 (Amendments of 1973 to Federal Law) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · United States v. Abel · United States v. Jones · United States v. Diaz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]pecific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness' credibility, other than conviction of crime as provided in rule 609, may not be proved by extrinsic evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to the issue of bias, the district court did not abuse its discretion. 5. Defendant's Sentence 36 The district court determined a base offense of six for blowing up the mailbox at Rogers Plaza. However, the court further concluded that the base offense should be increased since defendant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t is the duty of the trial judge to determine whether there is sufficient evidence of entrapment to allow the issue to go before the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.