Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 F.2d 332 - Leal v. Krajewski

Leal v. Krajewski’s Empirical Analysis

803 F.2d 332 · 1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Wabash Valley Power Ass'n v. Rural Electrification Administration (1990), Welch v. Johnson (1990)

13 federal appellate ·

1601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Lee v. City of Peoria · Jones v. City of Alton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the former judgment must have been rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction; (2) the matter at issue was, or might have been, determined in the former suit; (3) the controversy adjudicated in the former suit was between parties to the present suit; and (4) the judgment in the former suit was rendered on the merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When an issue has already been litigated in a former suit, and the former suit precludes the litigation of that issue in a present suit, the preclusive effect is referred to as `issue preclusion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “give state court judgments 'the same full faith and credit ... as they have by law or usage in the courts of such state.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.