Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 F.2d 545 - Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Empirical Analysis

803 F.2d 545 · 1986

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
April 2017
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation (1991), Wyoming v. United States Department of Agriculture (2011)

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 300F · 42 U.S.C. § 300H · 42 U.S.C. § 6901 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Udall v. Tallman · Singleton v. Wulff · McGee v. International Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not empowered to substitute [our] judgment for that of the agency”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Section 1421(d)(1), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 300h(d)(1). Underground injection is a potentially widespread hazardous waste disposal practice that poses serious threats to groundwater sources of drinking water. [In enacting the SDWA,] Congress was particularly aware of the potential adverse effects of oil and gas related injection. The House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce noted the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[e]nergy production companies are using injection techniques to increase production and dispose of unwanted brines brought to the surface during production.... Part C [of the SDWA] is intended to deal with all of the foregoing situations insofar as they may endanger underground drinking water sources.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.