Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 F.2d 830 - Johnson v. Ol McCotter

Johnson v. Ol McCotter’s Empirical Analysis

803 F.2d 830 · 1986

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Leonard v. Dixie Well Service & Supply, Inc. (1987), Williams v. Whitley (1993)

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

18019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · Brown v. Wainwright · Chapman v. United States · Jones v. Wj Estelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “petitioner [is] given specific notice that the court is considering dismissal and given at least 10 days in which to explain the failure to raise the new grounds in a prior petition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, once raised, litigated and rejected at an earlier habeas proceeding cannot be raised in a later proceeding merely by varying the factors allegedly demonstrating incompetency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not allow the reassertion of claims for the sole reason that petitioner has now thought of another argument in support of the same claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.