Kramer v. Oc Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.2d 896 · 1986
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Terrazas-Garcia (1997), United States v. Keane (1988)
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4161 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Welch v. Helvering · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · United States v. Addonizio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is confined to the record before the Commission and limited to a search for 'some evidence' in support of the decision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Commission must have a reason for its decision. The record must show that the reason is not fanciful or suppositious. But the Commission need not hold adversarial proceedings or have the sort of evidence that would persuade a court.... Our review, with only a shadow of the scrutiny available under the [Administrative Procedures Act], likewise is confined to the record before the Commission and limited to a search for “some evidence” in support of the decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if it finds the information sufficiently accurate for its purposes,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.