United States v. Andersson’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.2d 903 · 1986
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2000
16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2255 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Turkette · New York v. Ferber · Stanley v. Georgia · Bowers v. Hardwick · United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he State's interests in regulating child pornography are radically different than those in regulating obscenity. The State's primary concern is protecting the child participants from that type of sexual abuse [and] the State's interests in regulating pedophilic pornography may well extend into the private home.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Thus even if [defendant] has a right to possess child pornography in his home, that right in no way extends to acquiring or providing such material for private use.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a constitutional right ... to distribute or sell obscene materials.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.