J.R. v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.3d 1315 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Zinermon v. Burch · O'Connor v. Donaldson · Jackson v. Indiana · Parham v. J. R.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A plaintiff challenging a law as facially unconstitutional 'must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the law would be valid.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) a deprivation of a constitutionally[ ] protected liberty or property interest; (2) state action; and (3) constitutionally inadequate process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“deprive any person of life, liberty, or property[ ] without due process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.