Smith v. Dart’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.3d 304 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Haines v. Kerner · Farmer v. Brennan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]acts alleged by a plaintiff in a brief in opposition to a motion to dismiss 'may be considered when evaluating the sufficiency of a complaint so long as they are consistent of the allegations in the complaint.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“little practical difference, if any, between the standards applicable to pretrial detainees and convicted inmates when it comes to conditions of confinement claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“supplement the complaint with factual narration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.