Zumel v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
803 F.3d 463 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Keene Corp. v. United States · Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder · Khan v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the BIA conducts its own review of the evidence and law, rather than adopting the IJ's decision, our review is limited to the BIA's decision, except to the extent the IJ's opinion is expressly adopted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mairena v. Barr“administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mairena v. Barr“The relevant inquiry under § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iii) is whether the activity is unlawful ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.