Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 F.3d 964 - Smith v. URS Corp.

Smith v. URS Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

803 F.3d 964 · 2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
April 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc. · Torgerson v. City of Rochester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. She has a disability within the meaning of the ADA; 2. She is qualified to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without reasonable accommodation; and 3. That she suffered an adverse employment action due to a disability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he test for whether employees are similarly situated is strict; the employees must be 'similarly situated in all material respects.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.