Holeman v. Neils’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2018
4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 44 (§ 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Fontenot v. Upjohn Co. · Calderone v. United States · State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Pickrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 56(c) requires the moving party to show not only the absence of a disputed fact but also that [the moving party] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.... Where the moving party has the burden ... [the] showing must be sufficient for the court to hold that no reasonable trier of fact could find other than for the moving party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the act, use or employment by any person of any deception, deceptive act or practice, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or concealment, suppression or omission of any material fact with intent that others rely upon such concealment, suppression or omission, in connection with the sale or advertisement of any merchandise whether or not any person has in fact been misled, deceived, or damaged thereby.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“actual damages suffered as a result of the unlawful act or practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.