McKeithan v. Boarman’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
17 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. · Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts have generally held that failure to respond to the [agency's] framing of the issue supports a finding that a plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to those claims not approved by the EEO.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. Because plaintiff failed to respond to the formal request, the court held that plaintiff did not fulfill her obligation to respond to reasonable requests in the course of the agency's investigation of her claims, and therefore failed to exhaust her administrative remedies as to those claims. Id. at 29 . However, a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arguably abandoned [the claims based on Sex and Religion] ... by failing to contest the EEO's framing of his complaint and by affirmatively stating that the actions taken against him were because of his age.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.