Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 FSUPP2D 652 - Green v. Floyd County

Green v. Floyd County’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Tucker v. Middleburg-Legacy Place, LLC · Rutherford v. Columbia Gas · Rigazio v. Archdiocese of Louisville · Brewer v. Hillard · First State Bank of Pineville v. Catron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he tort of outrage is still a permissible cause of action, despite the availability of more traditional torts, as long as the defendants solely intended to cause extreme emotional distress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.