Dumas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Green v. Georgia · Bivins v. State · Harrison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“: a proper hearing to determine reliability is held and the child testifies at the trial (emphasis added)). The purpose of the child hearsay hearing is to determine the admissibility of certain hearsay statements, considering specific factors that demonstrate the reliability of the statements. It is a preliminary juvenile matter to which the rules of evidence do not apply. Ind. Evidence Rule 101(c)(2) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stokes v. State · LH v. State“The rationale for exempting certain proceedings, including sentencing, from the rules of evidence is to provide the trial judge with the widest range of relevant information in reaching an informed decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Prosecutors are entitled to respond to allegations and inferences raised by the defense even if the prosecutor's response would otherwise be objectionable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State · Evans v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.