Weiss v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Perez v. United States Steel Corp. · Murray v. State · Majors v. Abell · Van Winkle v. Nash · Willett v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; [[Image here]] (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar services; (4) the amount involved and the results obtained; [and] [[Image here]] (7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“We will not disturb the trial court's findings or judgment unless they are clearly erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The purpose of findings of fact and conclusions of law is to provide the parties and reviewing courts with the theory upon which the case was decided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.