State v. Bobo’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

cited by 42 later decisions

states following

November 2021

most recently cited

1 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Thurman (1993), State v. Tiedemann (2007)

1 district · 41 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Benjamin v. United States · 13 Cal. 3d 528 - People v. Brisendine · State v. Hunt · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[W]e generally will not consider an issue, even a constitutional one, which the appellant raises on appeal for the first time.” State v. Webb, 790 P.2d 65, 77 (Utah App.1990). ”[T]he proper forum in which to commence thoughtful and probing analysis of state constitutional interpretation is before the trial court, not, as typically happens ... for the first time on appeal.” State v. Bobo, 803 P.2d 1268, 1273 (Utah App.1990). See also Zions First Nat. Bank v. National Am. Title Ins. Co., 749 P.2d 651, 654 (Utah 1988) (”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. West v. Thomson Newspapers · State v. Doyle
“demonstrate that state appellate courts regularly interpret even textually similar state constitutional provisions in a manner different from federal interpretations of the United States Constitution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Tiedemann
“[A]ny indication by officers that issuance of a warrant was inevitable would vitiate an ensuing consent if probable cause was anything less than iron-clad.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. State v. Harmon

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.