Bearpaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Transcripts in criminal cases shall consist of all proceedings held in open court including but not limited to voir dire, opening statements and final arguments, conferences with the presiding judge in open court and in the court chambers, in addition to the testimony of the case and other required materials."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schmidt v. State · Engle v. State

2. “See, likewise, the rule that a mandatory requirement for the court reporter to record all proceedings in a criminal case establishes a principle which cannot be overridden by any local practice, United States v. Brumley, 560 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir.1977). That court, in quoting United States v. Selva, 559 F.2d 1303, 1306 (5th Cir.1977), emphasized that "'[wlhen ... a criminal defendant is represented on appeal by counsel other than the attorney at trial, the absence of a substantial and significant portion ... of the record will result in a presumption of prejudice sufficient to mandate reversa Brumley, 560 F.2d at 1281 . # ogoe»”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lucero v. State

3. “'a substantial and significant portion ... of the record,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lucero v. State