Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 803 P.2d 714 - Manuel v. State

Manuel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Spuehler v. State · VanWoundenberg v. State · Vanwoudenberg v. Oklahoma · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`more than simply issue a subpoena and stop when it [was] returned”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 799 So. 2d 966 - Flowers v. State · 930 So. 2d 550 - Pilley v. State
  2. “both the defendant and the State must be accorded a liberal freedom to argue the evidence and its logical inferences during closing arguments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Tilley v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.