Kelly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kostic v. Smedley · DeNardo v. Municipality of Anchorage · Wortham v. State · Smedley v. Holt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No demand for the extradition of a person accused but not yet convicted of a crime in another state shall be recognized by the governor of this state unless ... [it] contain[s] ... an allegation that the accused was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime and that thereafter the accused fled the demanding state; except that this allegation may not be required in a proceeding based on AS 12.70.050[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buckley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.