803 So. 2d 1 - State v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 55 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.”

   9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 162 So. 3d 665 - State v. Thibodeaux · State v. Williams

2. “A change of venue shall be granted when the applicant proves that by reason of prejudice existing in the public mind or because of undue influence, or that for any other reason, a fair and impartial trial cannot be obtained in the parish where the prosecution is pending.”

   8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Thompson · State v. Davis

3. “bright line test for determining the degree of prejudice existing in the collective mind of the community . . . the defendant must show the extent of prejudice in the minds of the community as a result of such knowledge or exposure to the case before trial”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 931 So. 2d 432 - State v. Wright · 986 So. 2d 772 - State v. Logan