Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

803 So. 2d 760

Marrero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 31, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-10-31

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2017

3 state decisions

Relies on 790 So. 2d 550 - Major v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTION TO PASS UPON A QUESTION CERTIFIED TO BE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

¶2We grant the motion. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

¶3Motion granted; question certified.

/803/so2d/760 · .json · Public domain