Keeton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2018
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Carpenter · City of Austin v. Cannizzo · City of Pearland v. Alexander · Sullivan v. State · 92 Tex. Crim. 215 - Childress v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The fair market value of the property or service at the time and place of the offense; or (2) If the fair market value cannot be ascertained, the cost of replacing the property within a reasonable time after the theft.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. State · Washington v. State“is not specifically defined in the penal code. The Court of Criminal Appeals has filled this definitional void: Methods of proving fair market value have varied from showing retail price or sale price, to admitting testimony of an owner's opinion of value, to a non-owner's,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A defendant is free to rebut a store price as representative of fair market value by showing that such retail or sale price was inflated by that store as evidenced by the price of the item at the same kind of stores in the general locale . . .. Likewise, the State may present evidence showing the price charged at other stores, and argue that the sale price was low and did not reflect fair market value in the county. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.