Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.2d 103 - Francis v. Bowen

Francis v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.2d 103 · 1986

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
July 2021
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2021

8 federal appellate ·

8019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Lorin Corporation v. Goto & Company, Ltd. · Nash v. Black · McKenzie v. Bowen · First National Bank of Tekamah, Nebraska v. Hansen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'when the questions involved are questions of law or mixed questions of law and fact, or when neither the local court rule nor the magistrate's notice has clearly informed the [parties] that failure to object to the magistrate's report will result in a waiver of the right to appeal.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.