Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.2d 1078 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.2d 1078 · 1986

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
February 2022
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably United States v. Sharif (1987), United States v. Aceves-Rosales (1987)

41 federal appellate · 3 district ·

44019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Hamling v. United States · United States v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The government is entitled to all reasonable inferences that might be drawn from the evidence.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The fact that a jury verdict of guilty on one count of an indictment is logically incompatible with a verdict of not guilty on another count does not warrant reversal of the conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.