Warren v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
804 F.2d 1120 · 1986
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2020
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Patti v. Schweiker · Stuckey v. Weinberger · Hussein v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““codify the presumption that Patti created. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 1382c(a)(5) (1983 Supp.1986). We must now look to the statute and the regulations for guidance. These support the Secretary’s position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Warren v. Bowen“not contesting the existence of [claimant's already established] disability in 1978; what [s]he is contesting is [claimant's] disability when she reapplied for SSI in 1981.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.