Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.2d 116 - United States v. Young

United States v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.2d 116 · 1986

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably United States v. Brandon (1994), United States v. Aramony (1996)

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Weatherford v. Bursey · Allen v. Zurich Insurance · United States v. McKeon · Otherson v. Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service · Lovell v. Mixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Collateral estoppel, in contrast to res judi-cata, applies only to issues that were directly litigated and not to those which merely could have been litigated_ A fact establishing prior litigation not by judicial resolution but by stipulation has not been “actually litigated” and thus is the proper subject of proof in subsequent proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[L]itigation ... of the corporate versus personal status of Young's bail bonding business would have resulted only in a technical change in the way Young identified himself in his motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.