Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

804 F.2d 141

Docket Appeal No. 86-960.

Fortec Constructors v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided Oct. 31, 1986.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · decided 1986-10-31

2 counsel of record

Relies on Fortec Constructors v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-10-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2005

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Joseph T. Casey, Jr., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on *142the brief were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. James R. Thornton, Jr., Dept, of the Army, Savannah, Georgia, of counsel.

¶2David W. Mockbee, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, Jackson, Miss., argued for appellee.

¶3Before RICH, SMITH, and NIES, Circuit Judges.

¶4NIES, Circuit Judge.

¶5The United States appeals from the final judgment of the United States Claims Court, reported at 8 Cl.Ct. 490 (1985), awarding Fortec Constructors delay damages, an extension of contract time, interest, and costs. We affirm.

¶6OPINION

¶7Upon consideration of each of the government’s arguments, we conclude that the government has failed to establish any error in the court’s analysis. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Yock’s opinion.

¶8AFFIRMED.

/804/f2d/141 · .json · Public domain