Beermart, Inc. v. Stroh Brewery Co.’s Empirical Analysis
804 F.2d 409 · 1986
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2017
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roland Machinery Company v. Dresser Industries Inc · American Hospital Supply Corp. v. Hospital Products Ltd. · Lawson Products, Inc. v. Avnet, Inc. · Lippo v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 172 Ind. App. 81 - Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In contrast, the [trial] court here found that the only reason for the termination of BeerMart's contract with Stroh was BeerMart's willful, fraudulent, and deceptive acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the district court erroneously construed the Termination Statute to supersede the plain language of the agreement,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.