Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.2d 625 - United States v. Cure

United States v. Cure’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.2d 625 · 1986

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
December 2011
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably United States v. Nersesian (1987), United States v. Gimbel (1987)

55 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Kolender v. Lawson · Grayned v. City of Rockford · National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of Indians · Holmes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the existence of an agreement to achieve an unlawful objective; (2) the defendant's knowing and voluntary participation in the conspiracy; and (3) the commission of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a domestic financial institution is involved in a transaction for the payment, receipt, or transfer of United States coins or currency (or other monetary instruments the Secretary of the Treasury prescribes), in an amount, denomination, or amount and denomination, or under circumstances the Secretary prescribes by regulation, the institution and any other participant in the transaction the Secretary may prescribe shall file a report on the transaction at the time and in the way the Secretary prescribes; A participant acting for another person shall make the report as the agent or bailee of the person and identify the person for whom the transaction is being made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a domestic financial institution is involved in a transaction for the payment, receipt, or transfer of [currency, it] shall file a report on the transaction at the time and in the way the secretary prescribed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.