Anderson v. Ideal Basic Industries’s Empirical Analysis
804 F.2d 950 · 1986
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably 738 F. Supp. 214 - Lucas v. Leaseway Multi Transportation Service, Inc. (1990), Black v. Ryder/pie Nationwide Inc (1994)
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox · Ford Motor Co v. Huffman International Union United Automobile Aircraft and Agricultural Implementworkers of America Ci · National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. · William Ruzicka, and Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-Appellants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relevant issue in assessing a Union's judgment is not whether it acted incorrectly, but whether it acted in bad faith,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]ailure to exhaust internal procedures is excused when an employer's conduct amounts to a repudiation of the contractual procedures or when a union wrongfully refuses to process the grievance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We make no judgment as to whether in the event the Local members had exhausted their internal remedies the agreement would have provided for termination benefits in this situation. We conclude simply that it was reasonable for the Union negotiators to believe that members of the Local were not entitled to benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.