Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.2d 964 - Lawrence E. OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

Lawrence E. OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.2d 964 · 1986

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Brainard v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1989), Foster v. Halter (2001)

37 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mullen v. Bowen · Ward v. Schweiker · Willis v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “but only upon showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “); Ward v. Schweiker, 686 F.2d 762 , 764 (9th Cir.1982) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is well established that the party seeking remand bears the burden of showing that a remand is proper under Section 405.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.