Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.3d 13 - Cossart v. United Excel Corp.

Cossart v. United Excel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.3d 13 · 2015

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 16 district ·

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown · United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America v. Pleasant Street Corporation United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America · Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co. · Sawtelle v. Farrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the claim directly arises out of, or relates to, the defendant's forum state activities; (2) whether the defendant's in-state contacts represent a purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of that state's laws and making the defendant's involuntary presence before the state's courts foreseeable; and (3) whether the exercise of jurisdiction is reasonable.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a cause of action in law or equity arising from the person's ... transacting any business in this commonwealth.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “serves the important function of focusing the court's attention on the nexus between a plaintiff's claim and the defendant's contacts with the forum.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.