United States v. Perretta’s Empirical Analysis
804 F.3d 53 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 26 U.S.C. § 701 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gall v. United States · United States v. Duarte · United States v. Martin · United States v. Clogston · United States v. Flores-Machicote
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that an error occurred (2) which was clear or obvious and which not only (3) affected the defendant's substantial rights, but also (4) seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.