Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.3d 707 - Guzman v. Jones

Guzman v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.3d 707 · 2015

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate J Bosch Second National Bank of New Haven · Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. · Howe v. Scottsdale Insurance Co. · Brunnemann v. Terra International, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]educed prices that [an uninsured plaintiff] may have received had he participated in health benefits or insurance programs for which he may have been eligible are irrelevant according to Texas law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.