Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 F.3d 767 - Trimble v. Bobby

Trimble v. Bobby’s Empirical Analysis

804 F.3d 767 · 2015

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Irvin v. Dowd · Wainwright v. Witt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “particularly egregious situation in which an individual desired to participate on a jury because she wanted to provide one of the twelve votes for death against a particular defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “she did not think it would be fair to the defendant for her to sit on the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.