Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
804 F.3d 930 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Miller v. Gammie · Amf Incorporated v. Sleekcraft Boats E · Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. · Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Company · Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & Sons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a reasonably prudent consumer accustomed to shopping online”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the labeling and appearance of the advertisements and the surrounding context on the screen displaying the results page”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“are not exhaustive and other variables may come into play depending on the particular facts presented”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.