Schaefer v. Kumar’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Williams v. State · Majors v. Abell · Young v. Butts · 179 Ind. App. 134 - Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. Hott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is well settled that matters outside the record cannot be considered by this court on appeal.” Schaefer v. Kumar, 804 N.E.2d 184 , 187 n. 3 (Ind.Ct.App.2004), trans. denied. 4 . LHT asserts that”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“gives notice of the sale, the date of expiration of the period of redemption, and the date on or after which a petition for the tax deed will be filed to the owner and any person with a substantial property interest of public record in the tract or real property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if the address of the owner or person with a substantial property interest of public record upon diligent inquiry cannot be located ... notice may be given by publication ... onee each week for three (3) consecutive weeks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.