Songer v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
1 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. Hardy · 37 Colo. App. 372 - Eight Thousand West Corporation v. Stewart · Morris v. Redak · Bloskas v. Murray · Gallimore v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since an order granting a new trial is an interlocutory order, the district court has plenary power over it and this power to reconsider, revise, alter, or amend the interlocutory order is not subject to the limitations of Rule 59.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bowman v. Songer“[a] medical opinion is only admissible if founded on reasonable medical probability,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Ramirez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.