Lively v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 264 Cal. App. 2d 867 - Zidell v. Bright · Standish v. Department of Revenue · 39 Colo. App. 8 - Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev. · Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although an absolute rule preventing a subsequent consent after an initial refusal has the advantage of granting unmistakable clarity to the defendant's obligation under the implied consent law, it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.