Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

804 So. 2d 171

A.T.M. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 2000

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 2000-06-30

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2015

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MADDOX, Justice

¶1(dissenting).

¶2I respectfully dissent from the overruling of the State’s application directed toward this Court’s reversal of the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment affirming AT.M.’s convictions for sexual abuse in the second degree against Kamatra R. and attempted sexual abuse in the second degree against L.R. I would grant the State’s application and affirm that portion of the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment affirming A.T.M.’s convictions for sexual abuse in the second degree and attempted sexual abuse in the second degree.

/804/so2d/171 · .json · Public domain