Redden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 486 So. 2d 408 - Hall v. Mazzone · 381 So. 2d 45 - Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc. · Stewart v. Weaver · Whitt v. Hulsey · 620 So. 2d 582 - Ward v. City of Montgomery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where ore tenus evidence is presented to the trial court in a nonjury case, a judgment based on that evidence is presumed to be correct and will not be disturbed on appeal unless a consideration of the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom reveals that the judgment is plainly and palpably erroneous or manifestly unjust."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although we have concluded that the evidence in this case is undisputed, we note that the fact that the trial court viewed the property might warrant a more deferential standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Anonymous“[W]hen a trial court sits in judgment of facts that are undisputed, an appellate court will determine whether the trial court misapplied the law to those undisputed facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.