Rose v. Ditto’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 139 So. 2d 489 - National Exhibition Company v. Ball · 409 So. 2d 103 - Blaustein v. Weiss · Treasure Coast, Inc. v. Ludlum Const. Co., Inc. · Edward Waters College, Inc. v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) where there is an express recital in the party's contract; (2) where it can be determined from the subject matter of the contract that time was clearly an essential and vital part of the bargain; (3) where the treatment of time as non-essential would produce a hardship to the non-defaulting party; or (4) where notice has been given to the defaulting party requiring that the contract be performed within a stated time, which must be reasonable according to the circumstances.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“As a general rule, time is considered to be of the essence where an agreement specifies, or where such may be determined from the nature of the subject matter of the contract, or where treating time as non-essential would produce a hardship, or where notice has been given to the defaulting party requiring that the contract be performed within a stated time, which must be a reasonable time according to the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moss v. Moss
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.