Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 So. 2d 572 - Williams v. State

804 So. 2d 572 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · Grant v. State · State v. Glatzmayer · 487 So. 2d 1043 - State v. Thomas · 773 So. 2d 644 - Durr v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]onsecutive sentences for crimes arising from the same criminal episode under the PRR Act are not permitted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether the two offenses were committed during a single criminal episode is a question of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “generally consider[] factors such as the nature, time, place and number of victims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.