Dumas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 694 So. 2d 180 - Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. · 427 So. 2d 1192 - Narcise v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. · 475 So. 2d 1047 - Weber v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana · 634 So. 2d 331 - Steptoe v. Lallie Kemp Hosp. · 629 So. 2d 328 - Lambert v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“joint tortfeasor shall not be liable for more than his degree of fault and shall not be solidarily liable with any other person for damages attributable to the fault of such other person ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is the coextensiveness of the obligations for the same debt, and not the source of liability, which determines the solidarity of the obligation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.