804 So. 2d 924 - Johnson v. EnviroBlast’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Barrett v. TL James & Co. · Cobb v. Kleinpeter · 781 So. 2d 1 - Huang v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES · 652 So. 2d 108 - Williams v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Co. · 691 So. 2d 692 - Savoy v. Cecil Perry Imp. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) No compensation shall be allowed for an injury caused: [[Image here]] (b) by the injured employee's intoxication at the. time of the injury, unless the employee’s intoxication, resulted from ■ activities which were in pursuit of the employer’s interests or in which the employer procured the intoxicating beverage or substance and encouraged its use during the employee’s work hours.... . [[Image here]] (2) In determining whether or not an employer shall be exempt from and relieved of paying compensation because of injury sustained by an employee for any cause or reason set forth in this Subsection, the burden of proof shall be upon the employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[O]nce the employer has met the burden of proving intoxication at the time of the accident, it shall be presumed that the accident was caused by the intoxication. The burden of proof then is placed upon the employee to prove that the intoxication was not a contributing cause of the accident in order to defeat the intoxication defense of the employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“considering the obvious credibility determinations made herein”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.