Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 SW2D 463 - Reagan v. Vaughn

Reagan v. Vaughn’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
12
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Mendillo v. Board of Education (1998), Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc. (1992)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 87 state decisions — followed in 12 states

690199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co. · El Chico Corp. v. Poole · Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc. · 19 Cal. 3d 441 - Borer v. American Airlines, Inc. · Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The plaintiff was located near the scene of the accident, as contrasted with one who was a distance away from it; (2) The plaintiff suffered shock as a result of a direct emotional impact upon the plaintiff from a sensory and contemporaneous observance of the accident, as contrasted with learning of the accident from others after its occurrence; and (3) The plaintiff and the victim were closely related, as contrasted with an absence of any relationship or the presence of only a distant relationship.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here is no principled reason to accord the parental-child relationship second class status ***. The obvious and unquestionable significance of the parent-child relationship compels our recognition of a cause of action for loss of parental consortium.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[w]hile all family members enjoy a mutual interest in consortium, the parent-child relationship is undeniably unique and the wellspring from which other family relationships derive.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.