Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 804 SW2D 516 - Rodriguez v. State

Rodriguez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Connolly v. State (1999), Harris v. State (1992)

31 state decisions

140199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. State · Guillot v. State · Stover v. State · 162 Tex. Crim. 286 - Ex Parte Fennell · Langston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] trial court has jurisdiction to revoke ... probation ... after the probationary term has expired, as long as both a motion alleging a violation of probationary terms is filed and a capias or arrest warrant is issued prior to the expiration of the term, followed by due diligence to apprehend the probationer and to hear and determine the allegations in the motion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Perry v. State · Burch v. State
  2. “(1) a motion alleging a violation of the terms of probation was filed prior to the expiration of the probationary period; (2) a capias or arrest warrant was issued prior to the expiration of the term; and (3) the State used due diligence in apprehending the probationer, and in hearing and determining the allegations in the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Holtzman v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.